- 17 Apr, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Oran Agra authored
this test is time sensitive and it sometimes fail to pass below the latency threshold, even on strong machines. this test was the reson we're running just 2 parallel tests in the github actions CI, revering this.
-
- 07 Apr, 2020 9 commits
-
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
Oran Agra authored
-
Guy Benoish authored
There is an inherent race between the deferring client and the "main" client of the test: While the deferring client issues a blocking command, we can't know for sure that by the time the "main" client tries to issue another command (Usually one that unblocks the deferring client) the deferring client is even blocked... For lack of a better choice this commit uses TCL's 'after' in order to give some time for the deferring client to issues its blocking command before the "main" client does its thing. This problem probably exists in many other tests but this commit tries to fix blockonkeys.tcl
-
Valentino Geron authored
-
Guy Benoish authored
-
Guy Benoish authored
-
Valentino Geron authored
First, we must parse the IDs, so that we abort ASAP. The return value of this command cannot be an error if the client successfully acknowledged some messages, so it should be executed in a "all or nothing" fashion.
-
Guy Benoish authored
By using a "circular BRPOPLPUSH"-like scenario it was possible the get the same client on db->blocking_keys twice (See comment in moduleTryServeClientBlockedOnKey) The fix was actually already implememnted in moduleTryServeClientBlockedOnKey but it had a bug: the funxction should return 0 or 1 (not OK or ERR) Other changes: 1. Added two commands to blockonkeys.c test module (To reproduce the case described above) 2. Simplify blockonkeys.c in order to make testing easier 3. cast raxSize() to avoid warning with format spec
-
- 31 Mar, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Guy Benoish authored
Makse sure call() doesn't wrap replicated commands with a redundant MULTI/EXEC Other, unrelated changes: 1. Formatting compiler warning in INFO CLIENTS 2. Use CLIENT_ID_AOF instead of UINT64_MAX
-
Guy Benoish authored
Other changes: Support stream in serverLogObjectDebugInfo
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
37a10cef introduced automatic wrapping of MULTI/EXEC for the alsoPropagate API. However this collides with the built-in mechanism already present in module.c. To avoid complex changes near Redis 6 GA this commit introduces the ability to exclude call() MUTLI/EXEC wrapping for also propagate in order to continue to use the old code paths in module.c.
-
Oran Agra authored
the AOF will be loaded successfully, but the stream will be missing, i.e inconsistencies with the original db. this was because XADD with id of 0-0 would error. add a test to reproduce.
-
- 25 Mar, 2020 7 commits
-
-
antirez authored
-
Oran Agra authored
Redis refusing to run MULTI or EXEC during script timeout may cause partial transactions to run. 1) if the client sends MULTI+commands+EXEC in pipeline without waiting for response, but these arrive to the shards partially while there's a busy script, and partially after it eventually finishes: we'll end up running only part of the transaction (since multi was ignored, and exec would fail). 2) similar to the above if EXEC arrives during busy script, it'll be ignored and the client state remains in a transaction. the 3rd test which i added for a case where MULTI and EXEC are ok, and only the body arrives during busy script was already handled correctly since processCommand calls flagTransaction
-
antirez authored
-
bodong.ybd authored
-
WuYunlong authored
-
antirez authored
-
bodong.ybd authored
-
- 12 Mar, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Oran Agra authored
*** [err]: PSYNC2: total sum of full synchronizations is exactly 4 in tests/integration/psync2.tcl Expected 5 == 4 (context: type eval line 6 cmd {assert {$sum == 4}} proc ::test) issue was that sometime the test got an unexpected full sync since it tried to switch to the replica before it was in sync with it's master.
-
- 27 Feb, 2020 12 commits
-
-
Oran Agra authored
in some cases we were trying to kill the fork before it got created
-
Oran Agra authored
it seems that running two clients at a time is ok too, resuces action time from 20 minutes to 10. we'll use this for now, and if one day it won't be enough we'll have to run just the sensitive tests one by one separately from the others. this commit also fixes an issue with the defrag test that appears to be very rare.
-
Oran Agra authored
seems that github actions are slow, using just one client to reduce false positives. also adding verbose, testing only on latest ubuntu, and building on older one. when doing that, i can reduce the test threshold back to something saner
-
Oran Agra authored
I saw that the new defag test for list was failing in CI recently, so i reduce it's threshold from 12 to 60. besides that, i add / improve the latency test for that other two defrag tests (add a sensitive latency and digest / save checks) and fix bad usage of debug populate (can't overrides existing keys). this was the original intention, which creates higher fragmentation.
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
Guy Benoish authored
-
Oran Agra authored
When active defrag kicks in and finds a big list, it will create a bookmark to a node so that it is able to resume iteration from that node later. The quicklist manages that bookmark, and updates it in case that node is deleted. This will increase memory usage only on lists of over 1000 (see active-defrag-max-scan-fields) quicklist nodes (1000 ziplists, not 1000 items) by 16 bytes. In 32 bit build, this change reduces the maximum effective config of list-compress-depth and list-max-ziplist-size (from 32767 to 8191)
-
Guy Benoish authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
- 12 Feb, 2020 3 commits
- 04 Feb, 2020 1 commit
-
-
WuYunlong authored
-