1. 04 Dec, 2014 1 commit
  2. 03 Dec, 2014 2 commits
  3. 02 Dec, 2014 1 commit
    • antirez's avatar
      Mark PFCOUNT as read-only, even if not true. · 69efb59a
      antirez authored
      PFCOUNT is technically speaking a write command, since the cached value
      of the HLL is exposed in the data structure (design error, mea culpa), and
      can be modified by PFCOUNT.
      
      However if we flag PFCOUNT as "w", read only slaves can't execute the
      command, which is a problem since there are environments where slaves
      are used to scale PFCOUNT reads.
      
      Nor it is possible to just prevent PFCOUNT to modify the data structure
      in slaves, since without the cache we lose too much efficiency.
      
      So while this commit allows slaves to create a temporary inconsistency
      (the strings representing the HLLs in the master and slave can be
      different in certain moments) it is actually harmless.
      
      In the long run this should be probably fixed by turning the HLL into a
      more opaque representation, for example by storing the cached value in
      the part of the string which is not exposed (this should be possible
      with SDS strings).
      69efb59a
  4. 12 Nov, 2014 1 commit
  5. 29 Oct, 2014 5 commits
  6. 06 Oct, 2014 2 commits
  7. 19 Sep, 2014 1 commit
  8. 17 Sep, 2014 1 commit
    • antirez's avatar
      Don't propagate SAVE. · ef61ab63
      antirez authored
      This is a general fix (check that dirty delta is positive) but actually
      should have as the only effect fixing the SAVE propagation to
      AOF and slaves.
      ef61ab63
  9. 08 Sep, 2014 1 commit
  10. 26 Aug, 2014 9 commits
  11. 28 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  12. 18 Jul, 2014 10 commits
  13. 27 Jun, 2014 5 commits