Commit 3640e029 authored by antirez's avatar antirez
Browse files

Make comment about nack->consumer test for minidle more obvious.

Related to #5437.
parent 0b1784b1
......@@ -2169,8 +2169,10 @@ void xclaimCommand(client *c) {
if (nack != raxNotFound) {
/* We need to check if the minimum idle time requested
* by the caller is satisfied by this entry.
* Note that if nack->consumer is NULL, means the NACK
* is created by FORCE, we should ignore minidle. */
*
* Note that the nack could be created by FORCE, in this
* case there was no pre-existing entry and minidle should
* be ignored, but in that case nick->consumer is NULL. */
if (nack->consumer && minidle) {
mstime_t this_idle = now - nack->delivery_time;
if (this_idle < minidle) continue;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment