1. 18 Apr, 2023 1 commit
    • sundb's avatar
      Fix some compile warnings and errors when building with gcc-12 or clang (#12035) · 42c8c618
      sundb authored
      This PR is to fix the compilation warnings and errors generated by the latest
      complier toolchain, and to add a new runner of the latest toolchain for daily CI.
      
      ## Fix various compilation warnings and errors
      
      1) jemalloc.c
      
      COMPILER: clang-14 with FORTIFY_SOURCE
      
      WARNING:
      ```
      src/jemalloc.c:1028:7: warning: suspicious concatenation of string literals in an array initialization; did you mean to separate the elements with a comma? [-Wstring-concatenation]
                          "/etc/malloc.conf",
                          ^
      src/jemalloc.c:1027:3: note: place parentheses around the string literal to silence warning
                      "\"name\" of the file referenced by the symbolic link named "
                      ^
      ```
      
      REASON:  the compiler to alert developers to potential issues with string concatenation
      that may miss a comma,
      just like #9534 which misses a comma.
      
      SOLUTION: use `()` to tell the compiler that these two line strings are continuous.
      
      2) config.h
      
      COMPILER: clang-14 with FORTIFY_SOURCE
      
      WARNING:
      ```
      In file included from quicklist.c:36:
      ./config.h:319:76: warning: attribute declaration must precede definition [-Wignored-attributes]
      char *strcat(char *restrict dest, const char *restrict src) __attribute__((deprecated("please avoid use of unsafe C functions. prefer use of redis_strlcat instead")));
      ```
      
      REASON: Enabling _FORTIFY_SOURCE will cause the compiler to use `strcpy()` with check,
      it results in a deprecated attribute declaration after including <features.h>.
      
      SOLUTION: move the deprecated attribute declaration from config.h to fmacro.h before "#include <features.h>".
      
      3) networking.c
      
      COMPILER: GCC-12
      
      WARNING: 
      ```
      networking.c: In function ‘addReplyDouble.part.0’:
      networking.c:876:21: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
        876 |         dbuf[start] = '$';
            |                     ^
      networking.c:868:14: note: at offset -5 into destination object ‘dbuf’ of size 5152
        868 |         char dbuf[MAX_LONG_DOUBLE_CHARS+32];
            |              ^
      networking.c:876:21: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
        876 |         dbuf[start] = '$';
            |                     ^
      networking.c:868:14: note: at offset -6 into destination object ‘dbuf’ of size 5152
        868 |         char dbuf[MAX_LONG_DOUBLE_CHARS+32];
      ```
      
      REASON: GCC-12 predicts that digits10() may return 9 or 10 through `return 9 + (v >= 1000000000UL)`.
      
      SOLUTION: add an assert to let the compiler know the possible length;
      
      4) redis-cli.c & redis-benchmark.c
      
      COMPILER: clang-14 with FORTIFY_SOURCE
      
      WARNING:
      ```
      redis-benchmark.c:1621:2: warning: embedding a directive within macro arguments has undefined behavior [-Wembedded-directive] #ifdef USE_OPENSSL
      redis-cli.c:3015:2: warning: embedding a directive within macro arguments has undefined behavior [-Wembedded-directive] #ifdef USE_OPENSSL
      ```
      
      REASON: when _FORTIFY_SOURCE is enabled, the compiler will use the print() with
      check, which is a macro. this may result in the use of directives within the macro, which
      is undefined behavior.
      
      SOLUTION: move the directives-related code out of `print()`.
      
      5) server.c
      
      COMPILER: gcc-13 with FORTIFY_SOURCE
      
      WARNING:
      ```
      In function 'lookupCommandLogic',
          inlined from 'lookupCommandBySdsLogic' at server.c:3139:32:
      server.c:3102:66: error: '*(robj **)argv' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
       3102 |     struct redisCommand *base_cmd = dictFetchValue(commands, argv[0]->ptr);
            |                                                              ~~~~^~~
      ```
      
      REASON: The compiler thinks that the `argc` returned by `sdssplitlen()` could be 0,
      resulting in an empty array of size 0 being passed to lookupCommandLogic.
      this should be a false positive, `argc` can't be 0 when strings are not NULL.
      
      SOLUTION: add an assert to let the compiler know that `argc` is positive.
      
      6) sha1.c
      
      COMPILER: gcc-12
      
      WARNING:
      ```
      In function ‘SHA1Update’,
          inlined from ‘SHA1Final’ at sha1.c:195:5:
      sha1.c:152:13: warning: ‘SHA1Transform’ reading 64 bytes from a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overread]
        152 |             SHA1Transform(context->state, &data[i]);
            |             ^
      sha1.c:152:13: note: referencing argument 2 of type ‘const unsigned char[64]’
      sha1.c: In function ‘SHA1Final’:
      sha1.c:56:6: note: in a call to function ‘SHA1Transform’
         56 | void SHA1Transform(uint32_t state[5], const unsigned char buffer[64])
            |      ^
      In function ‘SHA1Update’,
          inlined from ‘SHA1Final’ at sha1.c:198:9:
      sha1.c:152:13: warning: ‘SHA1Transform’ reading 64 bytes from a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overread]
        152 |             SHA1Transform(context->state, &data[i]);
            |             ^
      sha1.c:152:13: note: referencing argument 2 of type ‘const unsigned char[64]’
      sha1.c: In function ‘SHA1Final’:
      sha1.c:56:6: note: in a call to function ‘SHA1Transform’
         56 | void SHA1Transform(uint32_t state[5], const unsigned char buffer[64])
      ```
      
      REASON: due to the bug[https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80922], when
      enable LTO, gcc-12 will not see `diagnostic ignored "-Wstringop-overread"`, resulting in a warning.
      
      SOLUTION: temporarily set SHA1Update to noinline to avoid compiler warnings due
      to LTO being enabled until the above gcc bug is fixed.
      
      7) zmalloc.h
      
      COMPILER: GCC-12
      
      WARNING: 
      ```
      In function ‘memset’,
          inlined from ‘moduleCreateContext’ at module.c:877:5,
          inlined from ‘RM_GetDetachedThreadSafeContext’ at module.c:8410:5:
      /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:59:10: warning: ‘__builtin_memset’ writing 104 bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Wstringop-overflow=]
         59 |   return __builtin___memset_chk (__dest, __ch, __len,
      ```
      
      REASON: due to the GCC-12 bug [https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96503],
      GCC-12 cannot see alloc_size, which causes GCC to think that the actual size of memory
      is 0 when checking with __glibc_objsize0().
      
      SOLUTION: temporarily set malloc-related interfaces to `noinline` to avoid compiler warnings
      due to LTO being enabled until the above gcc bug is fixed.
      
      ## Other changes
      1) Fixed `ps -p [pid]`  doesn't output `<defunct>` when using procps 4.x causing `replication
        child dies when parent is killed - diskless` test to fail.
      2) Add a new fortify CI with GCC-13 and ubuntu-lunar docker image.
      42c8c618
  2. 12 Oct, 2021 1 commit
    • Oran Agra's avatar
      fix a rare active defrag edge case bug leading to stagnation · c6a26519
      Oran Agra authored
      There's a rare case which leads to stagnation in the defragger, causing
      it to keep scanning the keyspace and do nothing (not moving any
      allocation), this happens when all the allocator slabs of a certain bin
      have the same % utilization, but the slab from which new allocations are
      made have a lower utilization.
      
      this commit fixes it by removing the current slab from the overall
      average utilization of the bin, and also eliminate any precision loss in
      the utilization calculation and move the decision about the defrag to
      reside inside jemalloc.
      
      and also add a test that consistently reproduce this issue.
      c6a26519
  3. 10 Oct, 2021 2 commits
  4. 20 May, 2020 1 commit
    • Oran Agra's avatar
      fix a rare active defrag edge case bug leading to stagnation · 88d71f47
      Oran Agra authored
      There's a rare case which leads to stagnation in the defragger, causing
      it to keep scanning the keyspace and do nothing (not moving any
      allocation), this happens when all the allocator slabs of a certain bin
      have the same % utilization, but the slab from which new allocations are
      made have a lower utilization.
      
      this commit fixes it by removing the current slab from the overall
      average utilization of the bin, and also eliminate any precision loss in
      the utilization calculation and move the decision about the defrag to
      reside inside jemalloc.
      
      and also add a test that consistently reproduce this issue.
      88d71f47
  5. 27 Jun, 2018 1 commit
  6. 24 May, 2018 1 commit
  7. 17 May, 2018 1 commit
    • Oran Agra's avatar
      Active defrag fixes for 32bit builds · ad133e10
      Oran Agra authored
      problems fixed:
      * failing to read fragmentation information from jemalloc
      * overflow in jemalloc fragmentation hint to the defragger
      * test suite not triggering eviction after population
      ad133e10
  8. 22 Apr, 2017 1 commit
  9. 30 Jan, 2017 1 commit
    • antirez's avatar
      Jemalloc updated to 4.4.0. · 27e29f4f
      antirez authored
      The original jemalloc source tree was modified to:
      
      1. Remove the configure error that prevents nested builds.
      2. Insert the Redis private Jemalloc API in order to allow the
      Redis fragmentation function to work.
      27e29f4f
  10. 30 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  11. 06 Oct, 2015 1 commit
  12. 20 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  13. 28 Nov, 2012 1 commit
  14. 16 May, 2012 1 commit
  15. 23 Nov, 2011 1 commit
  16. 20 Jun, 2011 1 commit