- 24 May, 2013 2 commits
-
-
antirez authored
When master send commands, there is no need for the slave to reply. Redis used to queue the reply in the output buffer and discard the reply later, this is a waste of work and it is not clear why it was this way (I sincerely don't remember). This commit changes it in order to don't queue the reply at all. All tests passing.
-
antirez authored
We don't write the output buffer to the client socket for slaves only if the slave is not online.
-
- 18 May, 2013 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
Should be "continue" and was "return". This fixes issue #1110
-
- 15 May, 2013 20 commits
-
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
Required because of recent changes in the way logfile is set to standard output.
-
antirez authored
Also the logfile option was modified to always have an explicit value and to log to stdout when an empty string is used as log file. Previously there was special handling of the string "stdout" that set the logfile to NULL, this always required some special handling.
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
- 14 May, 2013 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 09 May, 2013 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 08 May, 2013 5 commits
-
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
The test checks both successful syncs and unsuccessful ones by changing the backlog size.
-
antirez authored
The test actually worked, but vars for master and slave were inverted and sometimes used incorrectly.
-
Jiahao Huang authored
bitcount commant may return negtive integer with string length more than 256 MB
-
antirez authored
-
- 02 May, 2013 3 commits
-
-
antirez authored
This is just to make the code exactly like the above instance used for requirepass. No actual change nor the original code violated the Redis coding style.
-
Michel Martens authored
-
charsyam authored
There was a race condition in the AOF rewrite code that, with bad enough timing, could cause a volatile key just about to expire to be turned into a non-volatile key. The bug was never reported to cause actualy issues, but was found analytically by an user in the Redis mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/redis-db/Kvh2FAGK4Uk This commit fixes issue #1079.
-
- 30 Apr, 2013 3 commits
-
-
antirez authored
Tilt mode was too aggressive (not processing INFO output), this resulted in a few problems: 1) Redirections were not followed when in tilt mode. This opened a window to misinform clients about the current master when a Sentinel was in tilt mode and a fail over happened during the time it was not able to update the state. 2) It was possible for a Sentinel exiting tilt mode to detect a false fail over start, if a slave rebooted with a wrong configuration about at the same time. This used to happen since in tilt mode we lose the information that the runid changed (reboot). Now instead the Sentinel in tilt mode will still remove the instance from the list of slaves if it changes state AND runid at the same time. Both are edge conditions but the changes should overall improve the reliability of Sentinel.
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
We used to always turn a master into a slave if the DEMOTE flag was set, as this was a resurrecting master instance. However the following race condition is possible for a Sentinel that got partitioned or internal issues (tilt mode), and was not able to refresh the state in the meantime: 1) Sentinel X is running, master is instance "A". 3) "A" fails, sentinels will promote slave "B" as master. 2) Sentinel X goes down because of a network partition. 4) "A" returns available, Sentinels will demote it as a slave. 5) "B" fails, other Sentinels will promote slave "A" as master. 6) At this point Sentinel X comes back. When "X" comes back he thinks that: "B" is the master. "A" is the slave to demote. We want to avoid that Sentinel "X" will demote "A" into a slave. We also want that Sentinel "X" will detect that the conditions changed and will reconfigure itself to monitor the right master. There are two main ways for the Sentinel to reconfigure itself after this event: 1) If "B" is reachable and already configured as a slave by other sentinels, "X" will perform a redirection to "A". 2) If there are not the conditions to demote "A", the fact that "A" reports to be a master will trigger a failover detection in "X", that will end into a reconfiguraiton to monitor "A". However if the Sentinel was not reachable, its state may not be updated, so in case it titled, or was partiitoned from the master instance of the slave to demote, the new implementation waits some time (enough to guarantee we can detect the new INFO, and new DOWN conditions). If after some time still there are not the right condiitons to demote the instance, the DEMOTE flag is cleared.
-
- 29 Apr, 2013 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 24 Apr, 2013 3 commits
-
-
antirez authored
Sentinel redirected to the master if the instance changed runid or it was the first time we got INFO, and a role change was detected from master to slave. While this is a good idea in case of slave->master, since otherwise we could detect a failover without good reasons just after a reboot with a slave with a wrong configuration, in the case of master->slave transition is much better to always perform the redirection for the following reasons: 1) A Sentinel may go down for some time. When it is back online there is no other way to understand there was a failover. 2) Pointing clients to a slave seems to be always the wrong thing to do. 3) There is no good rationale about handling things differently once an instance is rebooted (runid change) in that case.
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
This prevents the kernel from putting too much stuff in the output buffers, doing too heavy I/O all at once. So the goal of this commit is to split the disk pressure due to the AOF rewrite process into smaller spikes. Please see issue #1019 for more information.
-