- 11 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
guybe7 authored
Work in progress towards implementing a reply schema as part of COMMAND DOCS, see #9845 Since ironing the details of the reply schema of each and every command can take a long time, we would like to merge this PR when the infrastructure is ready, and let this mature in the unstable branch. Meanwhile the changes of this PR are internal, they are part of the repo, but do not affect the produced build. ### Background In #9656 we add a lot of information about Redis commands, but we are missing information about the replies ### Motivation 1. Documentation. This is the primary goal. 2. It should be possible, based on the output of COMMAND, to be able to generate client code in typed languages. In order to do that, we need Redis to tell us, in detail, what each reply looks like. 3. We would like to build a fuzzer that verifies the reply structure (for now we use the existing testsuite, see the "Testing" section) ### Schema The idea is to supply some sort of schema for the various replies of each command. The schema will describe the conceptual structure of the reply (for generated clients), as defined in RESP3. Note that the reply structure itself may change, depending on the arguments (e.g. `XINFO STREAM`, with and without the `FULL` modifier) We decided to use the standard json-schema (see https://json-schema.org/) as the reply-schema. Example for `BZPOPMIN`: ``` "reply_schema": { "oneOf": [ { "description": "Timeout reached and no elements were popped.", "type": "null" }, { "description": "The keyname, popped member, and its score.", "type": "array", "minItems": 3, "maxItems": 3, "items": [ { "description": "Keyname", "type": "string" }, { "description": "Member", "type": "string" }, { "description": "Score", "type": "number" } ] } ] } ``` #### Notes 1. It is ok that some commands' reply structure depends on the arguments and it's the caller's responsibility to know which is the relevant one. this comes after looking at other request-reply systems like OpenAPI, where the reply schema can also be oneOf and the caller is responsible to know which schema is the relevant one. 2. The reply schemas will describe RESP3 replies only. even though RESP3 is structured, we want to use reply schema for documentation (and possibly to create a fuzzer that validates the replies) 3. For documentation, the description field will include an explanation of the scenario in which the reply is sent, including any relation to arguments. for example, for `ZRANGE`'s two schemas we will need to state that one is with `WITHSCORES` and the other is without. 4. For documentation, there will be another optional field "notes" in which we will add a short description of the representation in RESP2, in case it's not trivial (RESP3's `ZRANGE`'s nested array vs. RESP2's flat array, for example) Given the above: 1. We can generate the "return" section of all commands in [redis-doc](https://redis.io/commands/) (given that "description" and "notes" are comprehensive enough) 2. We can generate a client in a strongly typed language (but the return type could be a conceptual `union` and the caller needs to know which schema is relevant). see the section below for RESP2 support. 3. We can create a fuzzer for RESP3. ### Limitations (because we are using the standard json-schema) The problem is that Redis' replies are more diverse than what the json format allows. This means that, when we convert the reply to a json (in order to validate the schema against it), we lose information (see the "Testing" section below). The other option would have been to extend the standard json-schema (and json format) to include stuff like sets, bulk-strings, error-string, etc. but that would mean also extending the schema-validator - and that seemed like too much work, so we decided to compromise. Examples: 1. We cannot tell the difference between an "array" and a "set" 2. We cannot tell the difference between simple-string and bulk-string 3. we cannot verify true uniqueness of items in commands like ZRANGE: json-schema doesn't cover the case of two identical members with different scores (e.g. `[["m1",6],["m1",7]]`) because `uniqueItems` compares (member,score) tuples and not just the member name. ### Testing This commit includes some changes inside Redis in order to verify the schemas (existing and future ones) are indeed correct (i.e. describe the actual response of Redis). To do that, we added a debugging feature to Redis that causes it to produce a log of all the commands it executed and their replies. For that, Redis needs to be compiled with `-DLOG_REQ_RES` and run with `--reg-res-logfile <file> --client-default-resp 3` (the testsuite already does that if you run it with `--log-req-res --force-resp3`) You should run the testsuite with the above args (and `--dont-clean`) in order to make Redis generate `.reqres` files (same dir as the `stdout` files) which contain request-response pairs. These files are later on processed by `./utils/req-res-log-validator.py` which does: 1. Goes over req-res files, generated by redis-servers, spawned by the testsuite (see logreqres.c) 2. For each request-response pair, it validates the response against the request's reply_schema (obtained from the extended COMMAND DOCS) 5. In order to get good coverage of the Redis commands, and all their different replies, we chose to use the existing redis test suite, rather than attempt to write a fuzzer. #### Notes about RESP2 1. We will not be able to use the testing tool to verify RESP2 replies (we are ok with that, it's time to accept RESP3 as the future RESP) 2. Since the majority of the test suite is using RESP2, and we want the server to reply with RESP3 so that we can validate it, we will need to know how to convert the actual reply to the one expected. - number and boolean are always strings in RESP2 so the conversion is easy - objects (maps) are always a flat array in RESP2 - others (nested array in RESP3's `ZRANGE` and others) will need some special per-command handling (so the client will not be totally auto-generated) Example for ZRANGE: ``` "reply_schema": { "anyOf": [ { "description": "A list of member elements", "type": "array", "uniqueItems": true, "items": { "type": "string" } }, { "description": "Members and their scores. Returned in case `WITHSCORES` was used.", "notes": "In RESP2 this is returned as a flat array", "type": "array", "uniqueItems": true, "items": { "type": "array", "minItems": 2, "maxItems": 2, "items": [ { "description": "Member", "type": "string" }, { "description": "Score", "type": "number" } ] } } ] } ``` ### Other changes 1. Some tests that behave differently depending on the RESP are now being tested for both RESP, regardless of the special log-req-res mode ("Pub/Sub PING" for example) 2. Update the history field of CLIENT LIST 3. Added basic tests for commands that were not covered at all by the testsuite ### TODO - [x] (maybe a different PR) add a "condition" field to anyOf/oneOf schemas that refers to args. e.g. when `SET` return NULL, the condition is `arguments.get||arguments.condition`, for `OK` the condition is `!arguments.get`, and for `string` the condition is `arguments.get` - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11896 - [x] (maybe a different PR) also run `runtest-cluster` in the req-res logging mode - [x] add the new tests to GH actions (i.e. compile with `-DLOG_REQ_RES`, run the tests, and run the validator) - [x] (maybe a different PR) figure out a way to warn about (sub)schemas that are uncovered by the output of the tests - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11897 - [x] (probably a separate PR) add all missing schemas - [x] check why "SDOWN is triggered by misconfigured instance replying with errors" fails with --log-req-res - [x] move the response transformers to their own file (run both regular, cluster, and sentinel tests - need to fight with the tcl including mechanism a bit) - [x] issue: module API - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11898 - [x] (probably a separate PR): improve schemas: add `required` to `object`s - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11899 Co-authored-by:
Ozan Tezcan <ozantezcan@gmail.com> Co-authored-by:
Hanna Fadida <hanna.fadida@redislabs.com> Co-authored-by:
Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com> Co-authored-by:
Shaya Potter <shaya@redislabs.com>
-
- 31 May, 2022 1 commit
-
-
zhaozhao.zz authored
since the sharded pubsub is different with pubsub, it's better to give users a hint to make it more clear.
-
- 30 Mar, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Binbin authored
This PR do some command json files cleanups: 1. Add COMMAND TIPS to some commands - command-docs: add `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT_ORDER` - command-info: add `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT_ORDER` - command-list: add `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT_ORDER` - command: change `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT` to `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT_ORDER` - function-list: add `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT_ORDER` - latency-doctor: add `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT`, `REQUEST_POLICY:ALL_NODES` and `RESPONSE_POLICY:SPECIAL` - latency-graph: add `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT`, `REQUEST_POLICY:ALL_NODES` and `RESPONSE_POLICY:SPECIAL` - memory-doctor: add `REQUEST_POLICY:ALL_SHARDS` and `RESPONSE_POLICY:SPECIAL` - memory-malloc-stats: add `REQUEST_POLICY:ALL_SHARDS` and `RESPONSE_POLICY:SPECIAL` - memory-purge: add `REQUEST_POLICY:ALL_SHARDS` and `RESPONSE_POLICY:ALL_SUCCEEDED` - module-list: add `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT_ORDER` - msetnx: add `REQUEST_POLICY:MULTI_SHARD` and `RESPONSE_POLICY:AGG_MIN` - object-refcount: add `NONDETERMINISTIC_OUTPUT` 3. Only (mostly) indentation and formatting changes: - cluster-shards - latency-history - pubsub-shardchannels - pubsub-shardnumsub - spublish - ssubscribe - sunsubscribe 4. add doc_flags (DEPRECATED) to cluster-slots, replaced_by `CLUSTER SHARDS` in 7.0 5. command-getkeysandflags: a better summary (the old one is copy from command-getkeys) 6. adjustment of command parameter types - `port` is integer, not string (`MIGRATE`, `REPLICAOF`, `SLAVEOF`) - `replicationid` is string, not integer (`PSYNC`) - `pattern` is pattern, not string (`PUBSUB CHANNELS`, `SENTINEL RESET`, `SORT`, `SORT_RO`)
-
- 22 Feb, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Madelyn Olson authored
This implements the following main pieces of functionality: * Renames key spec "CHANNEL" to be "NOT_KEY", and update the documentation to indicate it's for cluster routing and not for any other key related purpose. * Add the getchannels-api, so that modules can now define commands that are subject to ACL channel permission checks. * Add 4 new flags that describe how a module interacts with a command (SUBSCRIBE, PUBLISH, UNSUBSCRIBE, and PATTERN). They are all technically composable, however not sure how a command could both subscribe and unsubscribe from a command at once, but didn't see a reason to add explicit validation there. * Add two new module apis RM_ChannelAtPosWithFlags and RM_IsChannelsPositionRequest to duplicate the functionality provided by the keys position APIs. * The RM_ACLCheckChannelPermissions (only released in 7.0 RC1) was changed to take flags rather than a boolean literal. * The RM_ACLCheckKeyPermissions (only released in 7.0 RC1) was changed to take flags corresponding to keyspecs instead of custom permission flags. These keyspec flags mimic the flags for ACLCheckChannelPermissions.
-
- 18 Jan, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Oran Agra authored
The new ACL key based permissions in #9974 require the key-specs (#8324) to have more explicit flags rather than just READ and WRITE. See discussion in #10040 This PR defines two groups of flags: One about how redis internally handles the key (mutually-exclusive). The other is about the logical operation done from the user's point of view (3 mutually exclusive write flags, and one read flag, all optional). In both groups, if we can't explicitly flag something as explicit read-only, delete-only, or insert-only, we flag it as `RW` or `UPDATE`. here's the definition from the code: ``` /* Key-spec flags * * -------------- */ /* The following refer what the command actually does with the value or metadata * of the key, and not necessarily the user data or how it affects it. * Each key-spec may must have exaclty one of these. Any operation that's not * distinctly deletion, overwrite or read-only would be marked as RW. */ #define CMD_KEY_RO (1ULL<<0) /* Read-Only - Reads the value of the key, but * doesn't necessarily returns it. */ #define CMD_KEY_RW (1ULL<<1) /* Read-Write - Modifies the data stored in the * value of the key or its metadata. */ #define CMD_KEY_OW (1ULL<<2) /* Overwrite - Overwrites the data stored in * the value of the key. */ #define CMD_KEY_RM (1ULL<<3) /* Deletes the key. */ /* The follwing refer to user data inside the value of the key, not the metadata * like LRU, type, cardinality. It refers to the logical operation on the user's * data (actual input strings / TTL), being used / returned / copied / changed, * It doesn't refer to modification or returning of metadata (like type, count, * presence of data). Any write that's not INSERT or DELETE, would be an UPADTE. * Each key-spec may have one of the writes with or without access, or none: */ #define CMD_KEY_ACCESS (1ULL<<4) /* Returns, copies or uses the user data from * the value of the key. */ #define CMD_KEY_UPDATE (1ULL<<5) /* Updates data to the value, new value may * depend on the old value. */ #define CMD_KEY_INSERT (1ULL<<6) /* Adds data to the value with no chance of, * modification or deletion of existing data. */ #define CMD_KEY_DELETE (1ULL<<7) /* Explicitly deletes some content * from the value of the key. */ ``` Unrelated changes: - generate-command-code.py is only compatible with python3 (modified the shabang) - generate-command-code.py print file on json parsing error - rename `shard_channel` key-spec flag to just `channel`. - add INCOMPLETE flag in input spec of SORT and SORT_RO
-
- 03 Jan, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Harkrishn Patro authored
This commit implements a sharded pubsub implementation based off of shard channels. Co-authored-by:
Harkrishn Patro <harkrisp@amazon.com> Co-authored-by:
Madelyn Olson <madelyneolson@gmail.com>
-