1. 11 Mar, 2023 1 commit
    • guybe7's avatar
      Add reply_schema to command json files (internal for now) (#10273) · 4ba47d2d
      guybe7 authored
      Work in progress towards implementing a reply schema as part of COMMAND DOCS, see #9845
      Since ironing the details of the reply schema of each and every command can take a long time, we
      would like to merge this PR when the infrastructure is ready, and let this mature in the unstable branch.
      Meanwhile the changes of this PR are internal, they are part of the repo, but do not affect the produced build.
      
      ### Background
      In #9656 we add a lot of information about Redis commands, but we are missing information about the replies
      
      ### Motivation
      1. Documentation. This is the primary goal.
      2. It should be possible, based on the output of COMMAND, to be able to generate client code in typed
        languages. In order to do that, we need Redis to tell us, in detail, what each reply looks like.
      3. We would like to build a fuzzer that verifies the reply structure (for now we use the existing
        testsuite, see the "Testing" section)
      
      ### Schema
      The idea is to supply some sort of schema for the various replies of each command.
      The schema will describe the conceptual structure of the reply (for generated clients), as defined in RESP3.
      Note that the reply structure itself may change, depending on the arguments (e.g. `XINFO STREAM`, with
      and without the `FULL` modifier)
      We decided to use the standard json-schema (see https://json-schema.org/) as the reply-schema.
      
      Example for `BZPOPMIN`:
      ```
      "reply_schema": {
          "oneOf": [
              {
                  "description": "Timeout reached and no elements were popped.",
                  "type": "null"
              },
              {
                  "description": "The keyname, popped member, and its score.",
                  "type": "array",
                  "minItems": 3,
                  "maxItems": 3,
                  "items": [
                      {
                          "description": "Keyname",
                          "type": "string"
                      },
                      {
                          "description": "Member",
                          "type": "string"
                      },
                      {
                          "description": "Score",
                          "type": "number"
                      }
                  ]
              }
          ]
      }
      ```
      
      #### Notes
      1.  It is ok that some commands' reply structure depends on the arguments and it's the caller's responsibility
        to know which is the relevant one. this comes after looking at other request-reply systems like OpenAPI,
        where the reply schema can also be oneOf and the caller is responsible to know which schema is the relevant one.
      2. The reply schemas will describe RESP3 replies only. even though RESP3 is structured, we want to use reply
        schema for documentation (and possibly to create a fuzzer that validates the replies)
      3. For documentation, the description field will include an explanation of the scenario in which the reply is sent,
        including any relation to arguments. for example, for `ZRANGE`'s two schemas we will need to state that one
        is with `WITHSCORES` and the other is without.
      4. For documentation, there will be another optional field "notes" in which we will add a short description of
        the representation in RESP2, in case it's not trivial (RESP3's `ZRANGE`'s nested array vs. RESP2's flat
        array, for example)
      
      Given the above:
      1. We can generate the "return" section of all commands in [redis-doc](https://redis.io/commands/)
        (given that "description" and "notes" are comprehensive enough)
      2. We can generate a client in a strongly typed language (but the return type could be a conceptual
        `union` and the caller needs to know which schema is relevant). see the section below for RESP2 support.
      3. We can create a fuzzer for RESP3.
      
      ### Limitations (because we are using the standard json-schema)
      The problem is that Redis' replies are more diverse than what the json format allows. This means that,
      when we convert the reply to a json (in order to validate the schema against it), we lose information (see
      the "Testing" section below).
      The other option would have been to extend the standard json-schema (and json format) to include stuff
      like sets, bulk-strings, error-string, etc. but that would mean also extending the schema-validator - and that
      seemed like too much work, so we decided to compromise.
      
      Examples:
      1. We cannot tell the difference between an "array" and a "set"
      2. We cannot tell the difference between simple-string and bulk-string
      3. we cannot verify true uniqueness of items in commands like ZRANGE: json-schema doesn't cover the
        case of two identical members with different scores (e.g. `[["m1",6],["m1",7]]`) because `uniqueItems`
        compares (member,score) tuples and not just the member name. 
      
      ### Testing
      This commit includes some changes inside Redis in order to verify the schemas (existing and future ones)
      are indeed correct (i.e. describe the actual response of Redis).
      To do that, we added a debugging feature to Redis that causes it to produce a log of all the commands
      it executed and their replies.
      For that, Redis needs to be compiled with `-DLOG_REQ_RES` and run with
      `--reg-res-logfile <file> --client-default-resp 3` (the testsuite already does that if you run it with
      `--log-req-res --force-resp3`)
      You should run the testsuite with the above args (and `--dont-clean`) in order to make Redis generate
      `.reqres` files (same dir as the `stdout` files) which contain request-response pairs.
      These files are later on processed by `./utils/req-res-log-validator.py` which does:
      1. Goes over req-res files, generated by redis-servers, spawned by the testsuite (see logreqres.c)
      2. For each request-response pair, it validates the response against the request's reply_schema
        (obtained from the extended COMMAND DOCS)
      5. In order to get good coverage of the Redis commands, and all their different replies, we chose to use
        the existing redis test suite, rather than attempt to write a fuzzer.
      
      #### Notes about RESP2
      1. We will not be able to use the testing tool to verify RESP2 replies (we are ok with that, it's time to
        accept RESP3 as the future RESP)
      2. Since the majority of the test suite is using RESP2, and we want the server to reply with RESP3
        so that we can validate it, we will need to know how to convert the actual reply to the one expected.
         - number and boolean are always strings in RESP2 so the conversion is easy
         - objects (maps) are always a flat array in RESP2
         - others (nested array in RESP3's `ZRANGE` and others) will need some special per-command
           handling (so the client will not be totally auto-generated)
      
      Example for ZRANGE:
      ```
      "reply_schema": {
          "anyOf": [
              {
                  "description": "A list of member elements",
                  "type": "array",
                  "uniqueItems": true,
                  "items": {
                      "type": "string"
                  }
              },
              {
                  "description": "Members and their scores. Returned in case `WITHSCORES` was used.",
                  "notes": "In RESP2 this is returned as a flat array",
                  "type": "array",
                  "uniqueItems": true,
                  "items": {
                      "type": "array",
                      "minItems": 2,
                      "maxItems": 2,
                      "items": [
                          {
                              "description": "Member",
                              "type": "string"
                          },
                          {
                              "description": "Score",
                              "type": "number"
                          }
                      ]
                  }
              }
          ]
      }
      ```
      
      ### Other changes
      1. Some tests that behave differently depending on the RESP are now being tested for both RESP,
        regardless of the special log-req-res mode ("Pub/Sub PING" for example)
      2. Update the history field of CLIENT LIST
      3. Added basic tests for commands that were not covered at all by the testsuite
      
      ### TODO
      
      - [x] (maybe a different PR) add a "condition" field to anyOf/oneOf schemas that refers to args. e.g.
        when `SET` return NULL, the condition is `arguments.get||arguments.condition`, for `OK` the condition
        is `!arguments.get`, and for `string` the condition is `arguments.get` - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11896
      - [x] (maybe a different PR) also run `runtest-cluster` in the req-res logging mode
      - [x] add the new tests to GH actions (i.e. compile with `-DLOG_REQ_RES`, run the tests, and run the validator)
      - [x] (maybe a different PR) figure out a way to warn about (sub)schemas that are uncovered by the output
        of the tests - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11897
      - [x] (probably a separate PR) add all missing schemas
      - [x] check why "SDOWN is triggered by misconfigured instance replying with errors" fails with --log-req-res
      - [x] move the response transformers to their own file (run both regular, cluster, and sentinel tests - need to
        fight with the tcl including mechanism a bit)
      - [x] issue: module API - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11898
      - [x] (probably a separate PR): improve schemas: add `required` to `object`s - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11899
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOzan Tezcan <ozantezcan@gmail.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarHanna Fadida <hanna.fadida@redislabs.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarShaya Potter <shaya@redislabs.com>
      4ba47d2d
  2. 19 Dec, 2021 1 commit
    • YaacovHazan's avatar
      Protected configs and sensitive commands (#9920) · ae2f5b7b
      YaacovHazan authored
      Block sensitive configs and commands by default.
      
      * `enable-protected-configs` - block modification of configs with the new `PROTECTED_CONFIG` flag.
         Currently we add this flag to `dbfilename`, and `dir` configs,
         all of which are non-mutable configs that can set a file redis will write to.
      * `enable-debug-command` - block the `DEBUG` command
      * `enable-module-command` - block the `MODULE` command
      
      These have a default value set to `no`, so that these features are not
      exposed by default to client connections, and can only be set by modifying the config file.
      
      Users can change each of these to either `yes` (allow all access), or `local` (allow access from
      local TCP connections and unix domain connections)
      
      Note that this is a **breaking change** (specifically the part about MODULE command being disabled by default).
      I.e. we don't consider DEBUG command being blocked as an issue (people shouldn't have been using it),
      and the few configs we protected are unlikely to have been set at runtime anyway.
      On the other hand, it's likely to assume some users who use modules, load them from the config file anyway.
      Note that's the whole point of this PR, for redis to be more secure by default and reduce the attack surface on
      innocent users, so secure defaults will necessarily mean a breaking change.
      ae2f5b7b
  3. 11 Jul, 2021 1 commit
  4. 24 Jun, 2021 1 commit
    • Yossi Gottlieb's avatar
      Add bind-source-addr configuration argument. (#9142) · f233c4c5
      Yossi Gottlieb authored
      In the past, the first bind address that was explicitly specified was
      also used to bind outgoing connections. This could result with some
      problems. For example: on some systems using `bind 127.0.0.1` would
      result with outgoing connections also binding to `127.0.0.1` and failing
      to connect to remote addresses.
      
      With the recent change to the way `bind` is handled, this presented
      other issues:
      
      * The default first bind address is '*' which is not a valid address.
      * We make no distinction between user-supplied config that is identical
      to the default, and the default config.
      
      This commit addresses both these issues by introducing an explicit
      configuration parameter to control the bind address on outgoing
      connections.
      f233c4c5
  5. 22 Jun, 2021 2 commits
    • Yossi Gottlieb's avatar
      Fix typo in test. (#9128) · 8284544a
      Yossi Gottlieb authored
      8284544a
    • Yossi Gottlieb's avatar
      Improve bind and protected-mode config handling. (#9034) · 07b0d144
      Yossi Gottlieb authored
      * Specifying an empty `bind ""` configuration prevents Redis from listening on any TCP port. Before this commit, such configuration was not accepted.
      * Using `CONFIG GET bind` will always return an explicit configuration value. Before this commit, if a bind address was not specified the returned value was empty (which was an anomaly).
      
      Another behavior change is that modifying the `bind` configuration to a non-default value will NO LONGER DISABLE protected-mode implicitly.
      07b0d144
  6. 09 Jun, 2021 1 commit
    • Yossi Gottlieb's avatar
      Improve test suite to handle external servers better. (#9033) · 8a86bca5
      Yossi Gottlieb authored
      This commit revives the improves the ability to run the test suite against
      external servers, instead of launching and managing `redis-server` processes as
      part of the test fixture.
      
      This capability existed in the past, using the `--host` and `--port` options.
      However, it was quite limited and mostly useful when running a specific tests.
      Attempting to run larger chunks of the test suite experienced many issues:
      
      * Many tests depend on being able to start and control `redis-server` themselves,
      and there's no clear distinction between external server compatible and other
      tests.
      * Cluster mode is not supported (resulting with `CROSSSLOT` errors).
      
      This PR cleans up many things and makes it possible to run the entire test suite
      against an external server. It also provides more fine grained controls to
      handle cases where the external server supports a subset of the Redis commands,
      limited number of databases, cluster mode, etc.
      
      The tests directory now contains a `README.md` file that describes how this
      works.
      
      This commit also includes additional cleanups and fixes:
      
      * Tests can now be tagged.
      * Tag-based selection is now unified across `start_server`, `tags` and `test`.
      * More information is provided about skipped or ignored tests.
      * Repeated patterns in tests have been extracted to common procedures, both at a
        global level and on a per-test file basis.
      * Cleaned up some cases where test setup was based on a previous test executing
        (a major anti-pattern that repeats itself in many places).
      * Cleaned up some cases where test teardown was not part of a test (in the
        future we should have dedicated teardown code that executes even when tests
        fail).
      * Fixed some tests that were flaky running on external servers.
      8a86bca5
  7. 27 Apr, 2021 1 commit
  8. 01 Mar, 2021 2 commits