- 11 Jun, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Matt Stancliff authored
The new check-for-number behavior of Lua arguments broke users who use large strings of just integers. The Lua number check would convert the string to a number, but that breaks user data because Lua numbers have limited precision compared to an arbitrarily precise number wrapped in a string. Regression fixed and new test added. Fixes #1118 again.
-
- 09 Jun, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Matt Stancliff authored
Behrad Zari discovered [1] and Josiah reported [2]: if you block and wait for a list to exist, but the list creates from a non-push command, the blocked client never gets notified. This commit adds notification of blocked clients into the DB layer and away from individual commands. Lists can be created by [LR]PUSH, SORT..STORE, RENAME, MOVE, and RESTORE. Previously, blocked client notifications were only triggered by [LR]PUSH. Your client would never get notified if a list were created by SORT..STORE or RENAME or a RESTORE, etc. Blocked client notification now happens in one unified place: - dbAdd() triggers notification when adding a list to the DB Two new tests are added that fail prior to this commit. All test pass. Fixes #1668 [1]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/redis-db/k4oWfMkN1NU [2]: #1668
-
- 06 Jun, 2014 1 commit
-
-
yoav authored
-
- 04 Jun, 2014 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 22 May, 2014 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 20 May, 2014 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 19 May, 2014 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 07 May, 2014 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
SPOP, tested in the new test, is among the commands rewritng the client->argv argument vector (it gets rewritten as SREM) for command replication purposes. Because of recent optimizations to client->argv caching in the context of the Lua internal Redis client, it is important to test for SPOP to be callable from Lua without bad effects to the other commands.
-
- 23 Apr, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Matt Stancliff authored
Verify proper expire-before-delete behavior. This test passes with the expire-before-delete commit and fails without it.
-
- 18 Apr, 2014 3 commits
- 16 Apr, 2014 4 commits
- 05 Mar, 2014 2 commits
- 27 Feb, 2014 6 commits
-
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
It was verified in practice that this test is able to stress much more the implementation by introducing errors that were only trivially to detect with different offsets but impossible to detect starting always at zero and counting bits the full length of the string.
-
antirez authored
-
antirez authored
It was verified in practice that this test is able to stress much more the implementation by introducing errors that were only trivially to detect with different offsets but impossible to detect starting always at zero and counting bits the full length of the string.
-
- 13 Feb, 2014 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
It was verified that reverting the commit that fixes the bug, the test no longer passes.
-
- 09 Jan, 2014 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 08 Jan, 2014 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 13 Dec, 2013 1 commit
-
- 11 Dec, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Yossi Gottlieb authored
-
- 25 Nov, 2013 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
Fixes issue #1298.
-
- 05 Nov, 2013 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-
- 31 Oct, 2013 2 commits
- 30 Oct, 2013 6 commits
- 29 Oct, 2013 1 commit
-
-
antirez authored
-