1. 12 Apr, 2023 1 commit
    • Binbin's avatar
      Add RM_ReplyWithErrorFormat that can support format (#11923) · bfec2d70
      Binbin authored
      * Add RM_ReplyWithErrorFormat that can support format
      
      Reply with the error create from a printf format and arguments.
      
      If the error code is already passed in the string 'fmt', the error
      code provided is used, otherwise the string "-ERR " for the generic
      error code is automatically added.
      
      The usage is, for example:
          RedisModule_ReplyWithErrorFormat(ctx, "An error: %s", "foo");
          RedisModule_ReplyWithErrorFormat(ctx, "-WRONGTYPE Wrong Type: %s", "foo");
      
      The function always returns REDISMODULE_OK.
      bfec2d70
  2. 11 Mar, 2023 1 commit
    • guybe7's avatar
      Add reply_schema to command json files (internal for now) (#10273) · 4ba47d2d
      guybe7 authored
      Work in progress towards implementing a reply schema as part of COMMAND DOCS, see #9845
      Since ironing the details of the reply schema of each and every command can take a long time, we
      would like to merge this PR when the infrastructure is ready, and let this mature in the unstable branch.
      Meanwhile the changes of this PR are internal, they are part of the repo, but do not affect the produced build.
      
      ### Background
      In #9656 we add a lot of information about Redis commands, but we are missing information about the replies
      
      ### Motivation
      1. Documentation. This is the primary goal.
      2. It should be possible, based on the output of COMMAND, to be able to generate client code in typed
        languages. In order to do that, we need Redis to tell us, in detail, what each reply looks like.
      3. We would like to build a fuzzer that verifies the reply structure (for now we use the existing
        testsuite, see the "Testing" section)
      
      ### Schema
      The idea is to supply some sort of schema for the various replies of each command.
      The schema will describe the conceptual structure of the reply (for generated clients), as defined in RESP3.
      Note that the reply structure itself may change, depending on the arguments (e.g. `XINFO STREAM`, with
      and without the `FULL` modifier)
      We decided to use the standard json-schema (see https://json-schema.org/) as the reply-schema.
      
      Example for `BZPOPMIN`:
      ```
      "reply_schema": {
          "oneOf": [
              {
                  "description": "Timeout reached and no elements were popped.",
                  "type": "null"
              },
              {
                  "description": "The keyname, popped member, and its score.",
                  "type": "array",
                  "minItems": 3,
                  "maxItems": 3,
                  "items": [
                      {
                          "description": "Keyname",
                          "type": "string"
                      },
                      {
                          "description": "Member",
                          "type": "string"
                      },
                      {
                          "description": "Score",
                          "type": "number"
                      }
                  ]
              }
          ]
      }
      ```
      
      #### Notes
      1.  It is ok that some commands' reply structure depends on the arguments and it's the caller's responsibility
        to know which is the relevant one. this comes after looking at other request-reply systems like OpenAPI,
        where the reply schema can also be oneOf and the caller is responsible to know which schema is the relevant one.
      2. The reply schemas will describe RESP3 replies only. even though RESP3 is structured, we want to use reply
        schema for documentation (and possibly to create a fuzzer that validates the replies)
      3. For documentation, the description field will include an explanation of the scenario in which the reply is sent,
        including any relation to arguments. for example, for `ZRANGE`'s two schemas we will need to state that one
        is with `WITHSCORES` and the other is without.
      4. For documentation, there will be another optional field "notes" in which we will add a short description of
        the representation in RESP2, in case it's not trivial (RESP3's `ZRANGE`'s nested array vs. RESP2's flat
        array, for example)
      
      Given the above:
      1. We can generate the "return" section of all commands in [redis-doc](https://redis.io/commands/)
        (given that "description" and "notes" are comprehensive enough)
      2. We can generate a client in a strongly typed language (but the return type could be a conceptual
        `union` and the caller needs to know which schema is relevant). see the section below for RESP2 support.
      3. We can create a fuzzer for RESP3.
      
      ### Limitations (because we are using the standard json-schema)
      The problem is that Redis' replies are more diverse than what the json format allows. This means that,
      when we convert the reply to a json (in order to validate the schema against it), we lose information (see
      the "Testing" section below).
      The other option would have been to extend the standard json-schema (and json format) to include stuff
      like sets, bulk-strings, error-string, etc. but that would mean also extending the schema-validator - and that
      seemed like too much work, so we decided to compromise.
      
      Examples:
      1. We cannot tell the difference between an "array" and a "set"
      2. We cannot tell the difference between simple-string and bulk-string
      3. we cannot verify true uniqueness of items in commands like ZRANGE: json-schema doesn't cover the
        case of two identical members with different scores (e.g. `[["m1",6],["m1",7]]`) because `uniqueItems`
        compares (member,score) tuples and not just the member name. 
      
      ### Testing
      This commit includes some changes inside Redis in order to verify the schemas (existing and future ones)
      are indeed correct (i.e. describe the actual response of Redis).
      To do that, we added a debugging feature to Redis that causes it to produce a log of all the commands
      it executed and their replies.
      For that, Redis needs to be compiled with `-DLOG_REQ_RES` and run with
      `--reg-res-logfile <file> --client-default-resp 3` (the testsuite already does that if you run it with
      `--log-req-res --force-resp3`)
      You should run the testsuite with the above args (and `--dont-clean`) in order to make Redis generate
      `.reqres` files (same dir as the `stdout` files) which contain request-response pairs.
      These files are later on processed by `./utils/req-res-log-validator.py` which does:
      1. Goes over req-res files, generated by redis-servers, spawned by the testsuite (see logreqres.c)
      2. For each request-response pair, it validates the response against the request's reply_schema
        (obtained from the extended COMMAND DOCS)
      5. In order to get good coverage of the Redis commands, and all their different replies, we chose to use
        the existing redis test suite, rather than attempt to write a fuzzer.
      
      #### Notes about RESP2
      1. We will not be able to use the testing tool to verify RESP2 replies (we are ok with that, it's time to
        accept RESP3 as the future RESP)
      2. Since the majority of the test suite is using RESP2, and we want the server to reply with RESP3
        so that we can validate it, we will need to know how to convert the actual reply to the one expected.
         - number and boolean are always strings in RESP2 so the conversion is easy
         - objects (maps) are always a flat array in RESP2
         - others (nested array in RESP3's `ZRANGE` and others) will need some special per-command
           handling (so the client will not be totally auto-generated)
      
      Example for ZRANGE:
      ```
      "reply_schema": {
          "anyOf": [
              {
                  "description": "A list of member elements",
                  "type": "array",
                  "uniqueItems": true,
                  "items": {
                      "type": "string"
                  }
              },
              {
                  "description": "Members and their scores. Returned in case `WITHSCORES` was used.",
                  "notes": "In RESP2 this is returned as a flat array",
                  "type": "array",
                  "uniqueItems": true,
                  "items": {
                      "type": "array",
                      "minItems": 2,
                      "maxItems": 2,
                      "items": [
                          {
                              "description": "Member",
                              "type": "string"
                          },
                          {
                              "description": "Score",
                              "type": "number"
                          }
                      ]
                  }
              }
          ]
      }
      ```
      
      ### Other changes
      1. Some tests that behave differently depending on the RESP are now being tested for both RESP,
        regardless of the special log-req-res mode ("Pub/Sub PING" for example)
      2. Update the history field of CLIENT LIST
      3. Added basic tests for commands that were not covered at all by the testsuite
      
      ### TODO
      
      - [x] (maybe a different PR) add a "condition" field to anyOf/oneOf schemas that refers to args. e.g.
        when `SET` return NULL, the condition is `arguments.get||arguments.condition`, for `OK` the condition
        is `!arguments.get`, and for `string` the condition is `arguments.get` - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11896
      - [x] (maybe a different PR) also run `runtest-cluster` in the req-res logging mode
      - [x] add the new tests to GH actions (i.e. compile with `-DLOG_REQ_RES`, run the tests, and run the validator)
      - [x] (maybe a different PR) figure out a way to warn about (sub)schemas that are uncovered by the output
        of the tests - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11897
      - [x] (probably a separate PR) add all missing schemas
      - [x] check why "SDOWN is triggered by misconfigured instance replying with errors" fails with --log-req-res
      - [x] move the response transformers to their own file (run both regular, cluster, and sentinel tests - need to
        fight with the tcl including mechanism a bit)
      - [x] issue: module API - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11898
      - [x] (probably a separate PR): improve schemas: add `required` to `object`s - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11899
      
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOzan Tezcan <ozantezcan@gmail.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarHanna Fadida <hanna.fadida@redislabs.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarShaya Potter <shaya@redislabs.com>
      4ba47d2d
  3. 08 Dec, 2022 1 commit
  4. 15 Nov, 2022 1 commit
    • Binbin's avatar
      Fix double negative nan test, ignoring sign (#11506) · a4bcdbcf
      Binbin authored
      The test introduced in #11482 fail on ARM (extra CI):
      ```
      *** [err]: RESP2: RM_ReplyWithDouble: NaN in tests/unit/moduleapi/reply.tcl
      Expected '-nan' to be equal to 'nan' (context: type eval line 3 cmd
      {assert_equal "-nan" [r rw.double 0 0]} proc ::test)
      
      *** [err]: RESP3: RM_ReplyWithDouble: NaN in tests/unit/moduleapi/reply.tcl
      Expected ',-nan' to be equal to ',nan' (context: type eval line 8 cmd
      {assert_equal ",-nan" [r rw.double 0 0]} proc ::test)
      ```
      
      It looks like there is no negative nan on ARM. 
      a4bcdbcf
  5. 14 Nov, 2022 1 commit
    • Binbin's avatar
      Fix double inf test, use readraw to verify the protocol (#11504) · 2a2e5d41
      Binbin authored
      The test introduced in #11482 fail on mac:
      ```
      *** [err]: RESP3: RM_ReplyWithDouble: inf in tests/unit/moduleapi/reply.tcl
      Expected 'Inf' to be equal to 'inf'
      (context: type eval line 6 cmd {assert_equal Inf [r rw.double inf]} proc ::test)
      ```
      
      Looks like the mac platform returns inf instead of Inf in this case, this PR
      uses readraw to verify the protocol.
      2a2e5d41
  6. 13 Nov, 2022 1 commit
  7. 23 Jan, 2022 1 commit
    • Binbin's avatar
      sub-command support for ACL CAT and COMMAND LIST. redisCommand always stores fullname (#10127) · 23325c13
      Binbin authored
      
      
      Summary of changes:
      1. Rename `redisCommand->name` to `redisCommand->declared_name`, it is a
        const char * for native commands and SDS for module commands.
      2. Store the [sub]command fullname in `redisCommand->fullname` (sds).
      3. List subcommands in `ACL CAT`
      4. List subcommands in `COMMAND LIST`
      5. `moduleUnregisterCommands` now will also free the module subcommands.
      6. RM_GetCurrentCommandName returns full command name
      
      Other changes:
      1. Add `addReplyErrorArity` and `addReplyErrorExpireTime`
      2. Remove `getFullCommandName` function that now is useless.
      3. Some cleanups about `fullname` since now it is SDS.
      4. Delete `populateSingleCommand` function from server.h that is useless.
      5. Added tests to cover this change.
      6. Add some module unload tests and fix the leaks
      7. Make error messages uniform, make sure they always contain the full command
        name and that it's quoted.
      7. Fixes some typos
      
      see the history in #9504, fixes #10124
      Co-authored-by: default avatarOran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
      Co-authored-by: default avatarguybe7 <guy.benoish@redislabs.com>
      23325c13
  8. 01 Nov, 2021 1 commit
    • Oran Agra's avatar
      fix valgrind issues with long double module test (#9709) · f1f3cceb
      Oran Agra authored
      The module test in reply.tcl was introduced by #8521 but didn't run until recently (see #9639)
      and then it started failing with valgrind.
      This is because valgrind uses 64 bit long double (unlike most other platforms that have at least 80 bits)
      But besides valgrind, the tests where also incompatible with ARM32, which also uses 64 bit long doubles.
      
      We now use appropriate value to avoid issues with either valgrind or ARM32
      
      In all the double tests, i use 3.141, which is safe since since addReplyDouble uses
      `%.17Lg` which is able to represent this value without adding any digits due to precision loss. 
      
      In the long double, since we use `%.17Lf` in ld2string, it preserves 17 significant
      digits, rather than 17 digit after the decimal point (like in `%.17Lg`).
      So to make these similar, i use value lower than 1 (no digits left of
      the period)
      
      Lastly, we have the same issue with TCL (no long doubles) so we read
      raw protocol in that test.
      
      Note that the only error before this fix (in both valgrind and ARM32 is this:
      ```
      *** [err]: RM_ReplyWithLongDouble: a float reply in tests/unit/moduleapi/reply.tcl
      Expected '3.141' to be equal to '3.14100000000000001' (context: type eval line 2 cmd {assert_equal 3.141 [r rw.longdouble 3.141]} proc ::test)
      ```
      so the changes to debug.c and scripting.tcl aren't really needed, but i consider them a cleanup
      (i.e. scripting.c validated a different constant than the one that's sent to it from debug.c).
      
      Another unrelated change is to add the RESP version to the repeated tests in reply.tcl
      f1f3cceb
  9. 25 Oct, 2021 1 commit
  10. 03 Aug, 2021 1 commit